The silence is deafening on this morning after Election Day. Over the past few months, the media has been filled with negative, mean-spirited advertisements telling us that some political candidate or other was closely related to Evil Incarnate. Thank God for the Mute Button. It became so disgusting that I would often leave the Mute on because I just didn’t want to hear the garbage. I never ever thought I would be so delighted to hear that familiar phrase of the drug ads, “Ask you doctor”, once again.
Why have we gotten to this point? Have people forgotten that civilization starts with the word civil. It doesn’t seem so long ago that people of opposing views could not only have a discussion about the issues, but they could even enjoy the experience. What has happened to our culture that we have arrived at the point of intolerance?
I suspect that there are three culprits.
- Electronic Communications - We now dialog via bullets of information. We email, tweet, or facebook others who may be across town, across the hall, or across the room. We send packets of information without the nuance and subtlety that face-to-face dialog conveys. Without that subtlety, boundaries can be unknowingly crossed, sensitivities ignored. The seeds of discord can be planted.
- Lack of Adequate Time - Our society seems to have reached a point where the rapidity of a response is valued more highly than the quality of the insights offered. Quality responses often require a bit of reflection, which takes time. Take too much time, however, and the decision has already been made. The topic has changed. People have moved on. As a consequence, events are controlled by knee-jerk reactions which are typically not our best answers.
- Inflexibility - Locked into a box demanding quick responses based upon limited information, it is no wonder that the resulting decisions may not be the optimum choice. Once published, however, they have to be defended. This quickly leads to entrenched positions “based upon principle.” In other words, use some vague, dimly understood fundamental to justify a decision that had to be made too quickly. Stonewall the opponents out of the fear that flexibility can be interpreted as weakness rather than wisdom.
These constraints are especially evident within the political process. When talking to people from all around the world, you invariably hear that everyone seems dissatisfied with their own politicians. Yet these people are just like us. They just happen to be caught up in today’s strange environment where politicians want to be media stars, and media stars want to be entertainers. Its like we are all returning to sophomore year when the only goal in life was to be “popular”.
The traditional lines of responsibility are becoming blurred. In some ways, this microcosm, called politics, is bound to be dramatically influenced by constraints of communication, time, and flexibility. In a way, it acts as the canary in the mine, sending out an alert that our entire culture is being infected by the same fumes.
Despite these negatives, I am still happy to pay my taxes and live in this country. Politically, it is my job to search for information sources that attempt to limit their bias, read about and evaluate opposing viewpoints, reflect upon the implications of the various choices, make the choices that will be best for my grandchildren, completely ignore the incessant ads and robo-calls, and depress the mute button with abandon.
Hopefully, we will all learn to adjust to these constraints that technology has brought to our culture. It would be delightful to think that thoughtful reflection, polite conduct, serious communications, and the fun of negotiations could make a comeback not only in politics but in our society in general.
NB. Click below to make a comment. Even better, expand on the original article by going to wikiSenior and clicking on ‘edit’.