Human beings, as social creatures, are bound to live in community. But living in community brings with it two intrinsic elements - regulations and taxes.
In the history of mankind, you have to assume that regulations came before taxes. The first regulations likely involved the proper sharing of the food from the hunt. Time and work contributions to the community didn’t get replaced by taxes until some sort of currency was established. However, the lapse of time between the two couldn’t have been more than a few moments. No one with any power would skip an opportunity like that.
Eons later, we are still involved with community and still arguing about regulations and taxes. Conservatives want less sharing and stress the rights of the individual. Liberals stress the good of the community, and are more willing to accept regulations and taxes to enhance it. Obviously, both viewpoints have some validity. It is a question of balance.
Right now, the issue of Social Security is moving into the crosshairs of our Federal Government. Where is the proper balance?
When Social Security started out, it was an insurance plan. Our payroll deductions that were made for Social Security were insurance premiums. Like any insurance program, the money was to be invested and the benefits paid out of from the fruits of those investments. Those funds grew, performed, and began to look to tempting to ignore. Before long, Congress decided to “utilize” these funds and ignore the insurance concept. As a consequence, the program is under-funded today.
Now, what do we do? How about we allow senior citizens to work? Give them the choice.
- Possibly it is wrong to ask this question at this time when so many younger people are out of work, but many senior citizens would love the opportunity. But we live in a youth-oriented society, and in the workplace, senior citizens are more often tolerated than valued.
- Provide sliding scale tax incentives to companies that hire senior citizens. For example, one credit/hire for jobs that pay in the 20’s, two for jobs that pay in the 30’s, three for jobs that pay in the 40’s, etc. This would counter the earnings barrier that seniors face. As a professional who works to find jobs for seniors recently said, “The best opportunities that I can find for seniors in major cities pay $12/hour. I have people with PhD’s working for that.”
- Our current tax code already returns Social Security payments for anyone with some earnings. Working seniors not only recognize, but willingly accept that. Effectively, because of the opportunity to work, they are paying their own way.
- Promote job sharing so that those that didn’t want or need to work fulltime could share their responsibilities flexibly with another person. This arrangement could be very beneficial to organizations that have variable business demands.
Congress seems afraid to reduce Social Security, and the way things stand now, they should. However, if given an incentive, some of the younger members of our society might be courageous enough to stop calling us “Honey” or “Dear” and start treating us more as equals. They might be surprised that we have contributions to make and that experience really does have some value.
Today, Social Security is nothing more than guilt money. It allows Congress to assume the posture that the “senior issue” has not only been dealt with, but generously. However, if you ask anyone that has to live on it, they will laugh in your face. For many of these people, the opportunity for a job would be a gift.
Some sites for further thoughts are -
- There are a few opportunities, e.g. Experience Works
- A Canadian perspective, Senior Years
- Volunteering is the current option, e.g. Senior Corps
NB. Click below to make a comment. Even better, expand on the original article by going to wikiSenior and clicking on ‘edit’.